Pages

हमारी टीम का मानना ​​है कि प्रभावकारी संवाद मानवता की सबसे बड़ी चुनौतियों में से एक है. संवाद में अवरोध कहरबरपा सकता है और विचारों के सुव्यवस्थित और समुचित आदान प्रदान से अच्छे मित्र अर्जित किये जा सकते हैं. हम चाहते हैं आप सब इस प्रयास के लिए ह्रदय से योगदान करें. हम सभी प्रकार की टिप्पणियों, विज्ञान, कला, प्रौद्योगिकी, धर्म, राजनीतिक विचारधाराओं (व्यक्तिगत हमले को छोड़कर) का स्वागत करते हैं. हर व्यक्ति की अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता का परम सम्मान किया जाएगा. कृपया व्यक्तिगत हमले और विद्रोहात्मक तेवरों से बचें. हम सब अच्छे लोग हैं..... नहीं है क्या :)


By the way you have to visit ratzcorner to know what is around the corner...for, who else knows the corners better than rats(z)...by all us rats(contributors)

Total Pageviews

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

think about it,,,,,,,,,,




Hi friends,

following articles tells the very sad aspect of the science.
being in this field for more than 7-8 years, came across with not many but definitely quite a few people whose heart for the science is really sick.




more to come,,,,,,,,,


**
Hi,
Just for lazy persons these links may very well work:
* The politics of publication 
* Challenging the Tyranny of Impact Factors
* Playing the journal to give low impact factor journal more clout  ( Reply to this view)
* Rank injustice and misallocation of credits
* Mismeasurement of science
* Real lives and white lies in the funding of scientific research
* Men, women and ghosts in science
* Issues in INDIAN Science
* Issues on Visa exemptions to Scientists
* Ethics of Research the Freedom to 'withdraw'.
* Determining "Authorship"
* Achievement Index
* Who should define the ethics?
* Informed consent for clinical trials?
* Policies of Injuries to research participants in INDIA
* Group theory
* Fraud in Medical Research
* Ethics in Writing: Scientific Plagiarism, how to stay away?
* Fraud and Misconduct in Scientific Publications
* Retracted Science and the retraction index.
* Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant.
* Misconduct by Postdocs lead to retraction of papers.
* Nature's Peer review debate:
                         * Reviewers reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
                         * Referee Factor
Posted by Brajesh at 00:58

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous30 August 2011 at 13:54

    Hi,
    I wanted to post "an ideal guide" or something, then I thought that it would be probably too long or one sided.The paper you have posted is good to read and I hope that this will start a series of healthy arguments. Wait for some time for some more comments and as I have written some where let it give an air to the "chingaari" or flame. People should be concsious about the morals for which the govt funded by people of their country, funds the scientific institutions.Its not a sports or a game or fun, its SCIENCE.
    Thanks for your fruitful contribution.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)